View Issue Details
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|0002187||FreeCAD||Bug||public||2015-07-09 07:27||2018-08-26 15:20|
|Target Version||0.18||Fixed in Version||0.18|
|Summary||0002187: Sweep tool fails with Frenet=True on special Wire created from Section|
|Description||The Sweep tool creates an ugly structure when using Frenet=True, while the result with Frenet=False is ok.|
The attached macro creates with Draft.upgrade a special Wire from a Section which was built out of a Revolve and a Sweep.
|Steps To Reproduce||Run the macro once with Frenet=False and once with Frenet=True. This can be changed at the beginning of function create_geometries().|
A t t e n t i o n : The calculation might take some minutes.
|Additional Information||See also http://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=11705&p=94102#p94102|
||How can I delete here an attachment?|
||Bumped forum thread: https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=11705&p=156568#p156568|
The red spiral, in the above picture, is made of 4 BsplineCurves of degree 1 :
Edge 1, with 1026 poles
Edge 2, with 1026 poles
Edge 3, with 2463 poles
Edge 4, with 1003 poles
If I try to pick a normal somewhere on the first edge, I get :
That should explain why Frenet mode is failing.
The solution is probably to discretize the faulty wire and recreate a clean BSplineCurve by interpoation or approximation.
But is it a FreeCAD bug ?
Maybe the Sweep tool should check the sweep path more strictly ?
IMHO, but I am not a developer, this bug is valid.
The user doesn't even have an hint on what went wrong.
The user should, at least, be informed that the path is not valid for this sweep.
||@wmayer can you offer an opinion?|
||@frwi5432 do you mind uploading the macro and image again?|
attached you'll find the macro and the image.
Hope that helps.
Path0904-2.FCMacro (9,212 bytes)
Path0904-2.jpg (55,724 bytes)
Path0904-2.jpg (55,724 bytes)
Chris_G responded to the thread: https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=11705&start=10#p203254
UR_ responded as well: https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=11705&start=10#p204208
I knew DeepSOIC's macro.
My question was more : "Why does OCC have this strange behaviour ?"
Even if I suppose that we probably cannot do anything anyway :(
I think this one can be closed.
Fixed by this PR :
@Chris_G thanks! Sorry I can't attribute fix to you since you're not a developer per the tracker. I'll see what w can do about that
|2015-07-09 07:27||frwi5432||New Issue|
|2015-07-09 07:27||frwi5432||File Added: Path0904.FCMacro|
|2015-07-09 08:03||frwi5432||File Added: Path0904.jpg|
|2015-07-09 08:10||frwi5432||Note Added: 0006246|
|2017-01-19 13:11||Kunda1||Tag Attached: #pending|
|2017-01-28 13:23||Kunda1||Note Added: 0008054|
|2017-01-28 13:23||Kunda1||Status||new => feedback|
|2017-01-28 13:23||Kunda1||Tag Attached: sweep|
|2017-02-17 13:47||Kunda1||Relationship added||related to 0002509|
|2017-03-14 11:45||Kunda1||Priority||high => normal|
|2017-03-14 11:45||Kunda1||Severity||major => minor|
|2017-05-13 12:29||Kunda1||Note Added: 0008981|
|2017-05-13 12:29||Kunda1||Note Added: 0008982|
|2017-07-03 21:20||Kunda1||Note Added: 0009661|
|2017-08-23 11:58||Kunda1||Note Added: 0009997|
|2017-09-08 10:25||frwi5432||File Added: Path0904-2.FCMacro|
|2017-09-08 10:25||frwi5432||File Added: Path0904-2.jpg|
|2017-09-08 10:25||frwi5432||Note Added: 0010090|
|2017-09-08 10:25||frwi5432||Status||feedback => new|
|2018-03-03 10:40||Kunda1||Target Version||=> 0.18|
|2018-03-03 10:43||Kunda1||Note Added: 0010988|
|2018-06-14 05:32||Chris_G||Note Added: 0011431|
|2018-06-14 13:12||Kunda1||Status||new => closed|
|2018-06-14 13:12||Kunda1||Resolution||open => fixed|
|2018-06-14 13:12||Kunda1||Fixed in Version||=> 0.18|
|2018-06-14 13:12||Kunda1||Note Added: 0011434|
|2018-08-26 15:20||Kunda1||Tag Detached: #pending|