FreeCADView Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0002742 | FreeCAD | Bug | public | 2016-10-21 00:33 | 2018-09-22 11:45 |
| Reporter | DrC | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | duplicate | ||
| Platform | Windows | OS | XP | OS Version | Media Centre |
| Product Version | 0.16 | ||||
| Summary | 0002742: Unrelated features lost on edit. | ||||
| Description | The part is a cap for a cable conduit. It has to be fitted aroud an existing cable so it has a slit allowing it to be opened, fitted around the cable, then inserted over the end of the conduit. The condit draw string has to be fixed to the cap. so two substantial lugs are provided to attach the cord to. A previous edit increased all diameters slightly from the prototype which was successfully produced to verify the fit of the finished plug in the conduit. The prototype did not have lugs. The lugs were added and the diameters increased slightly, but I forgot to extend the slit so the finished part could not be fitted around the cable. This last edit is to extend the slit. Editing this sketch breaks the model. (to see what is happening the 0.5mm constraint can be widened to 2mm) | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce | Open file Note design of object - Edit sketch003: alter the final constraint from 25mm to 27mm NB there is an earlier constraint 25mm which does not change. Exit edit Part has lost one of the top blocks. | ||||
| Additional Information | OS: Windows XP Word size of OS: 32-bit Word size of FreeCAD: 32-bit Version: 0.16.6704 (Git) Build type: Release Branch: releases/FreeCAD-0-16 Hash: 0c449d7e8f9b2b1fb93e3f8d1865e2f59d7ed253 Python version: 2.7.8 Qt version: 4.8.6 Coin version: 4.0.0a OCC version: 6.8.0.oce-0.17 | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| FreeCAD Information | |||||
| duplicate of | 0000796 | closed | realthunder | Sketch of a feature "jumps" to another face after adding/deleting elements from the sketch of its support |
| child of | 0000922 | assigned | realthunder | Topological Naming |
|
|
|
|
|
OS: Mac OS X Word size of OS: 64-bit Word size of FreeCAD: 64-bit Version: 0.16.6706 (Git) Build type: Release Branch: tag: 0.16.6706 Hash: f86a4e411ff7848dea98d7242f43b7774bee8fa0 Python version: 2.7.11 Qt version: 4.8.7 Coin version: 3.1.3 OCC version: 6.8.0.oce-0.17 No issue for me, model is not broken while changing value on sketch 3 |
|
|
Thanks @nemesis Posted to forum: http://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=19840 |
|
|
@DrC please retest on a more recent version of FC (Branch 0.16.6706) |
|
|
OK ... 1. Original issue is unstable - the fault has a different effect today. FreeCad details unchanged but obiously several Windows updates in the meantime. Possibly picking up something random. But the edited file still has lug problems. Only the detail of the problem has changed. The problem could be in the Windows libraries. 2. Updated FreeCad - the update seems to have made no difference. The new problem detail is still exhibited. NB on the way I had to restore VisualC++ to its original status :-( I have uploaded the 6706 edited file. |
|
|
|
|
|
Oops ... Meant to include: OS: Windows XP Word size of OS: 32-bit Word size of FreeCAD: 32-bit Version: 0.16.6706 (Git) Build type: Release Branch: releases/FreeCAD-0-16 Hash: f86a4e411ff7848dea98d7242f43b7774bee8fa0 Python version: 2.7.8 Qt version: 4.8.7 Coin version: 4.0.0a OCC version: 6.8.0.oce-0.17 |
|
|
@chrisb and @normandc when you get a chance can you weigh on this issue? |
|
|
repost: @chrisb and @normandc when you get a chance can you weigh on this issue? |
|
|
I will have a look, from the description it sounds like a topological naming issue. |
|
|
It is again the topological naming issue. It belongs to 0000922 and can be seen as a duplicate of e.g. 0000796. Changing the value in Sketch003 as requested creates additional faces because it exceeds the inner diameter. Thus the result is very expected. |
|
|
@chrisb should I close this as a dupe of 0000796 ? Or is there a need for this usecase? |
|
|
Closing as a duplicate of 0000796 |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-10-21 00:33 | DrC | New Issue | |
| 2016-10-21 00:33 | DrC | File Added: DataConduitCapFaulty.FCStd | |
| 2017-01-11 21:25 | nemesis | Note Added: 0007655 | |
| 2017-01-13 12:54 | Kunda1 | Note Added: 0007709 | |
| 2017-01-28 20:03 | Kunda1 | Tag Attached: #pending | |
| 2017-02-09 22:24 | Kunda1 | Note Added: 0008256 | |
| 2017-02-09 22:24 | Kunda1 | Status | new => feedback |
| 2017-02-11 22:09 | DrC | Note Added: 0008273 | |
| 2017-02-11 22:09 | DrC | Status | feedback => new |
| 2017-02-11 22:10 | DrC | File Added: EditResult-0.16.6706.FCStd | |
| 2017-02-11 23:04 | DrC | Note Added: 0008274 | |
| 2017-02-16 16:18 | Kunda1 | Note Added: 0008324 | |
| 2017-03-24 14:14 | Kunda1 | Note Added: 0008695 | |
| 2017-03-24 15:14 | chrisb | Note Added: 0008696 | |
| 2017-03-24 15:39 | chrisb | Note Added: 0008698 | |
| 2017-05-24 18:08 | Kunda1 | Relationship added | child of 0000922 |
| 2017-05-24 18:09 | Kunda1 | Relationship added | duplicate of 0000796 |
| 2017-05-24 19:14 | Kunda1 | Note Added: 0009110 | |
| 2017-05-30 22:58 | Kunda1 | Assigned To | => jnxd |
| 2017-05-30 22:58 | Kunda1 | Status | new => assigned |
| 2017-05-30 22:58 | Kunda1 | Tag Detached: #pending | |
| 2018-09-22 11:45 | Kunda1 | Assigned To | jnxd => |
| 2018-09-22 11:45 | Kunda1 | Status | assigned => closed |
| 2018-09-22 11:45 | Kunda1 | Resolution | open => duplicate |
| 2018-09-22 11:45 | Kunda1 | Note Added: 0011811 |
